Tuesday, 21 February 2012
7 infra expectations from Budget 2012-13
Coming as it does at the beginning of the 12th Plan, and given the downbeat mood, there is genuine expectation from Budget 2012-13 that there will be far more action-orientation and policy setting than house keeping and populist schemes.
The infrastructure sector is keenly awaiting some energetic “get going” stimuli as it currently battles with the “triple whammy” of depleting order books, broken cash cycles and high debt leverage.
There is a misconception that the Union Budget does not matter for the infrastructure sector. what difference will it make?” is the cynical view. But that is not true.
Consider this. The infrastructure portion is 15% to 17% of the total Budget. But of the real discretionary portion, that is, Plan Expenditure, the share of infrastructure was 48.5% last year. Equally importantly, the Union Budget provides outlays for about 38% of the Five-Year-Plan targets.
According to the 11th Plan, the India needed Rs. 4.5 lakh crore a year and the Union Budget was able to provide Rs. 1.73 lakh crore of that last year.
What, then, are the key expectations from the forthcoming 2012-13 Budget?
i. A greater thrust towards increasing intermediation of retail savings into infrastructure debt. A good beginning has been made with private-sector infrastructure - NBFCs & public sector undertakings offering infrastructure-bonds. There is media speculation of enhancement of the exemption limit in infrastructure-bonds for retail investors from the current Rs. 20,000 to levels of Rs 50,000 or even Rs. 1,00,000. Linked to this should be the speeding up of the implementation of the $1,100 Crore national infrastructure debt fund & revisiting the strict credit rating and associated conditionalities that limit pension and insurance funds from channeling savings towards infrastructure debt.
ii: There is merit in considering the annuity model for rapidly developing infrastructure in rural and underdeveloped regions where market-driven PPP (public-private partnership projects) fail. Under annuity, the private sector can be roped in to mobilize capital, undertake construction and operations and maintenance for roads, irrigation et al and be paid an annuity (or rent cheque) for a concession period of, say, 20 years.
The issue here is the build-up of future liabilities of the sovereign to service these annuities. The solution is simple. Deflect conventional budgetary expenditure to a National Infrastructure Annuity Fund. So, instead of spending Rs. 1 lakh crore through a plethora of populist programmes and delivered (if at all) through buckets leaking like sieves, it may be a good idea to transfer Rs. 1 lakh crore from the Consolidated Fund of India to a National Infrastructure Annuity Fund. Annuity projects can, then, be awarded to the extent that the corpus of the fund can support. And, thus, there is no fear of future un-provided liabilities. Simple arithmetic shows that a Rs. 1 lakh crore contribution to the annuity corpus committed every year for the next 10 years can immediately enable concessioning out Rs. 4 lakh crore worth of projects today.
Look at the bang for the buck, the immediacy of the impact, the ring-fencing of future liabilities and, above all, the mood and order-book up liftment for the private sector. And this is a sure-fire way to impact underdeveloped areas too.
iii: Now very clearly somebody has to administer this annuity fund. More importantly, that “somebody” has also to galvanise the resurrection of all stuck infrastructure projects — public, or private, and remove policy logjams. That somebody also has to create a pipeline of projects to meet the 12th-Plan targets. So, one of the biggest “policy” expectations from the Budget is that the government will announce an appropriate body to handle the infrastructure sector holistically.
The big expectation is that a new infrastructure ministry will be announced to handle the huge set of challenges in a concerted and comprehensive manner. An infrastructure ministry with visionary political leadership, effective powers and live-wire officers can, then, be a structured institutional response to what is clearly now an onerous task dumped on the shoulders of the Principal Secretary in the Prime Minister’s Office.
iv: The biggest national embarrassment is our power sector. There is no way the Union Budget can choose not to have a point of view on the matter. There are 3 clear stands to be taken:
Settling the issue of financially and politically bankrupt state-owned distribution companies
A clear, transparent and long-term policy on fuels
The fate of domestic power-equipment manufacturers (private and public) vis-Ã -vis the clearly unequal playing-fields of China.
These should lift the long-term mood in this sector because it is inconceivable to have healthy sovereign finances in the absence of a healthy power sector.
v: Some housekeeping tasks also need to be effected to clear the clogged pipelines of day to day operations. Chief among them is the widely expected announcements regarding the “definition of infrastructure”. Specifics in section 80 IA (relating to the 10-year Income Tax holiday) require attention like “Greenfield” & “Brownfield”, the treatment of mergers and acquisitions and allowable window to choose the 10-year period. There are a few more issues concerning infrastructure special purpose vehicles like applicability of minimum alternate tax, dividend distribution tax and capital gains for unlisted companies.
vi: Land and environment are 2 of the biggest concerns for infrastructure developers right now. Even as the issue of “objectivity” in environment matters is still being sorted out, let us focus on the land matter.
It is necessary for the nation to find a long-term, sustainable, equitable and transparent solution to making land available for economic development. Such a solution has to encompass scientific methods of identifying appropriate land banks, master-planning of activity zones and provisioning of crucial transportation, energy, water and other links.
This is an essential developmental role of the “sovereign” and has to be undertaken in close cooperation between the Centre and states. It is, therefore, proposed that the government consider setting up a NLBC (National Land Bank Corporation) with an initial capitalization of Rs. 50,000 crore, under an Act of Parliament. As part of the scheme, states are to be encouraged and facilitated to set up their own State Land Bank Corporations in symbiotic relationship with the NLBC.
vii: Recent public controversies regarding lack of transparency and good governance have reiterated the long-standing demand for fresh legislation to create truly independent regulatory authorities for various infrastructure sectors. Draft legislation, adroitly prepared by the Planning Commission, has for long been awaiting political will. An announcement in the Budget to this effect will greatly enhance brand India.
BIO-DATA:Vinayak Chatterjee
Vinayak Chatterjee
Chairman :Feedback Ventures (P) Ltd.
Born in 1959, Vinayak Chatterjee is a graduate in Economics from St. Stephen's
College, Delhi University (1976-79) and a Post-graduate in Management from the
Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (1979-81). He co-founded the
Feedback Ventures Group in the early nineties.
Feedback Ventures is today India's leading integrated infrastructure development
group in the Core, Urban and Social infrastructure arena. It operates through its 5
divisions: Infrastructure Advisory, Engineering, Project Management, Capacity
Building and Energy .
The Feedback Ventures group today employs around 350 people with its
Headquarters in New Delhi and offices in Mumbai, Hyderabad, Bangalore, and
Chandigarh.
Over and above the Promoter group, key shareholders of Feedback Ventures include
HDFC, Mr. Gautam Thapar and SREI.
He occupies a pre-eminent position in India as a strategic advisor to leading
corporates, government and multilateral/bilateral institutions in the areas of economic
policy and infrastructure planning and implementation.
In 1998 the World Economic Forum at Davos nominated him as one of the 100
Global Leaders of Tomorrow.
He is currently the Chairman of the Confederation of Indian Industry’s (CII) National
Council on Infrastructure and Regulation. He was also Chairman of CII-National
Committee on Urban Infrastructure for the years 2002-03 & 2003-04 and was the
Chairman of CII (Northern Region) for the year 2000-2001.
He is also a member of the Board of Directors of SRF Limited.
The infrastructure sector is keenly awaiting some energetic “get going” stimuli as it currently battles with the “triple whammy” of depleting order books, broken cash cycles and high debt leverage.
There is a misconception that the Union Budget does not matter for the infrastructure sector. what difference will it make?” is the cynical view. But that is not true.
Consider this. The infrastructure portion is 15% to 17% of the total Budget. But of the real discretionary portion, that is, Plan Expenditure, the share of infrastructure was 48.5% last year. Equally importantly, the Union Budget provides outlays for about 38% of the Five-Year-Plan targets.
According to the 11th Plan, the India needed Rs. 4.5 lakh crore a year and the Union Budget was able to provide Rs. 1.73 lakh crore of that last year.
What, then, are the key expectations from the forthcoming 2012-13 Budget?
i. A greater thrust towards increasing intermediation of retail savings into infrastructure debt. A good beginning has been made with private-sector infrastructure - NBFCs & public sector undertakings offering infrastructure-bonds. There is media speculation of enhancement of the exemption limit in infrastructure-bonds for retail investors from the current Rs. 20,000 to levels of Rs 50,000 or even Rs. 1,00,000. Linked to this should be the speeding up of the implementation of the $1,100 Crore national infrastructure debt fund & revisiting the strict credit rating and associated conditionalities that limit pension and insurance funds from channeling savings towards infrastructure debt.
ii: There is merit in considering the annuity model for rapidly developing infrastructure in rural and underdeveloped regions where market-driven PPP (public-private partnership projects) fail. Under annuity, the private sector can be roped in to mobilize capital, undertake construction and operations and maintenance for roads, irrigation et al and be paid an annuity (or rent cheque) for a concession period of, say, 20 years.
The issue here is the build-up of future liabilities of the sovereign to service these annuities. The solution is simple. Deflect conventional budgetary expenditure to a National Infrastructure Annuity Fund. So, instead of spending Rs. 1 lakh crore through a plethora of populist programmes and delivered (if at all) through buckets leaking like sieves, it may be a good idea to transfer Rs. 1 lakh crore from the Consolidated Fund of India to a National Infrastructure Annuity Fund. Annuity projects can, then, be awarded to the extent that the corpus of the fund can support. And, thus, there is no fear of future un-provided liabilities. Simple arithmetic shows that a Rs. 1 lakh crore contribution to the annuity corpus committed every year for the next 10 years can immediately enable concessioning out Rs. 4 lakh crore worth of projects today.
Look at the bang for the buck, the immediacy of the impact, the ring-fencing of future liabilities and, above all, the mood and order-book up liftment for the private sector. And this is a sure-fire way to impact underdeveloped areas too.
iii: Now very clearly somebody has to administer this annuity fund. More importantly, that “somebody” has also to galvanise the resurrection of all stuck infrastructure projects — public, or private, and remove policy logjams. That somebody also has to create a pipeline of projects to meet the 12th-Plan targets. So, one of the biggest “policy” expectations from the Budget is that the government will announce an appropriate body to handle the infrastructure sector holistically.
The big expectation is that a new infrastructure ministry will be announced to handle the huge set of challenges in a concerted and comprehensive manner. An infrastructure ministry with visionary political leadership, effective powers and live-wire officers can, then, be a structured institutional response to what is clearly now an onerous task dumped on the shoulders of the Principal Secretary in the Prime Minister’s Office.
iv: The biggest national embarrassment is our power sector. There is no way the Union Budget can choose not to have a point of view on the matter. There are 3 clear stands to be taken:
Settling the issue of financially and politically bankrupt state-owned distribution companies
A clear, transparent and long-term policy on fuels
The fate of domestic power-equipment manufacturers (private and public) vis-Ã -vis the clearly unequal playing-fields of China.
These should lift the long-term mood in this sector because it is inconceivable to have healthy sovereign finances in the absence of a healthy power sector.
v: Some housekeeping tasks also need to be effected to clear the clogged pipelines of day to day operations. Chief among them is the widely expected announcements regarding the “definition of infrastructure”. Specifics in section 80 IA (relating to the 10-year Income Tax holiday) require attention like “Greenfield” & “Brownfield”, the treatment of mergers and acquisitions and allowable window to choose the 10-year period. There are a few more issues concerning infrastructure special purpose vehicles like applicability of minimum alternate tax, dividend distribution tax and capital gains for unlisted companies.
vi: Land and environment are 2 of the biggest concerns for infrastructure developers right now. Even as the issue of “objectivity” in environment matters is still being sorted out, let us focus on the land matter.
It is necessary for the nation to find a long-term, sustainable, equitable and transparent solution to making land available for economic development. Such a solution has to encompass scientific methods of identifying appropriate land banks, master-planning of activity zones and provisioning of crucial transportation, energy, water and other links.
This is an essential developmental role of the “sovereign” and has to be undertaken in close cooperation between the Centre and states. It is, therefore, proposed that the government consider setting up a NLBC (National Land Bank Corporation) with an initial capitalization of Rs. 50,000 crore, under an Act of Parliament. As part of the scheme, states are to be encouraged and facilitated to set up their own State Land Bank Corporations in symbiotic relationship with the NLBC.
vii: Recent public controversies regarding lack of transparency and good governance have reiterated the long-standing demand for fresh legislation to create truly independent regulatory authorities for various infrastructure sectors. Draft legislation, adroitly prepared by the Planning Commission, has for long been awaiting political will. An announcement in the Budget to this effect will greatly enhance brand India.
BIO-DATA:Vinayak Chatterjee
Vinayak Chatterjee
Chairman :Feedback Ventures (P) Ltd.
Born in 1959, Vinayak Chatterjee is a graduate in Economics from St. Stephen's
College, Delhi University (1976-79) and a Post-graduate in Management from the
Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (1979-81). He co-founded the
Feedback Ventures Group in the early nineties.
Feedback Ventures is today India's leading integrated infrastructure development
group in the Core, Urban and Social infrastructure arena. It operates through its 5
divisions: Infrastructure Advisory, Engineering, Project Management, Capacity
Building and Energy .
The Feedback Ventures group today employs around 350 people with its
Headquarters in New Delhi and offices in Mumbai, Hyderabad, Bangalore, and
Chandigarh.
Over and above the Promoter group, key shareholders of Feedback Ventures include
HDFC, Mr. Gautam Thapar and SREI.
He occupies a pre-eminent position in India as a strategic advisor to leading
corporates, government and multilateral/bilateral institutions in the areas of economic
policy and infrastructure planning and implementation.
In 1998 the World Economic Forum at Davos nominated him as one of the 100
Global Leaders of Tomorrow.
He is currently the Chairman of the Confederation of Indian Industry’s (CII) National
Council on Infrastructure and Regulation. He was also Chairman of CII-National
Committee on Urban Infrastructure for the years 2002-03 & 2003-04 and was the
Chairman of CII (Northern Region) for the year 2000-2001.
He is also a member of the Board of Directors of SRF Limited.
